“Blue Moon—you know the song? It was
playing when Hal and I first met,” the protagonist of Woody Allen’s newest
film, Blue Jasmine, repeatedly says.
Jasmine seems to be exploring a theme similar to others in Woody Allen’s recent
films: regret. It’s a theme audiences see in Midnight in Paris, as Gil desperately tries to find happiness in
the years of The Lost Generation, or in To
Rome With Love, as John travels back to the city he lived in while he was
still young. However, Blue Jasmine is
very different from these other films. Allen plays on his audience’s set
expectations to draw attention to Jasmine and her demise. The value of Blue Jasmine comes not from being
another charming Woody Allen film, but from the rather terrifying truth it
imparts, part of Allen’s own experiences. The film ends with Jasmine talking to
herself, homeless on a park bench, and perhaps this mirrors Allen’s own
regrets.
Blue
Jasmine begins, as in
any other Allen movie, with the classic titles and vintage jazz that have
become his trademarks. The film then proceeds to deliver, in many ways, what
audiences would expect from Allen: a warm, golden light, scenes with few cuts,
actors of fantastic repute, etc. However, these traditions of the auteur seem
ironic when put up against with the serious, almost cruel, theme Blue Jasmine explores. The film does not
provide the same comic relief Allen’s more recent films have, and the cheerful
music and golden design seem to foil the devastation of Jasmine’s situation.
Allen’s tradition gives the audience set expectations, but he effectively
wrenches those expectations with Blue Jasmine’s seriousness. This seriousness
sets Blue Jasmine apart from other
Allen films.
Another element of the film that sets it
apart is its lack of tourism. While films in Allen’s past have sold New York
apartments for millions and have created a mini-industry for Allen-inspired
city tours (Satran), Blue Jasmine
hardly explores San Francisco, being completely deficient in loving montages
and adoring shots of classic tourist areas. Instead the film limits its
locations to the small, run-down neighborhood of Jasmine’s sister or the
unrecognizable upscale apartments of Jasmine’s past. San Francisco is definitely
not the star in this film, as Allen said himself: "Her sister could have
lived anyplace and it would have been fine” (Olsen). By not focusing on the
city, Allen draws added attention to Jasmine and her circumstances, making it
less about the location, and more about Jasmine’s personal trials.
But what does this have to do with Woody Allen’s own
experiences? As shown in his previous films, Allen does not hesitate to make
his work somewhat autobiographical. His classic neurotic lead is not a far cry
from Allen himself. Here Allen, like Jasmine, fears looking back into the past
and seeing what he could have done differently. As he said, quoted in the LA
times:
"I would say, I've lived 77 years now, and there have been things in my life that I regret that if I could do over, I would do different…Many things that I think with the perspective of having done them and having time that I would do differently. Maybe even choice of profession. Many things” (Olsen).
Like
Jasmine, Allen is looking on his life and realizing that if he had done things
differently, things could have gone better.
In Jasmine’s past life she became
good at what she did—throwing parties and attending events—and she did it
plentifully. This is also an aligning character trait of Allen’s. Having made
48 films over the course of his career, Allen is easily labeled prolific. And
it’s what he will continue to do, as Charles McGrath pointed out in the
Washington Street Journal: “Allen continues to write and direct his own movies
at an assembly-line pace, just as he has for five decades… they come along—a
new one every year—as reliably as the taxman.” However, in the film Jasmine’s
world falls apart, and the steadiness of her work is wildly, horribly
interrupted.
Allen himself pinpointed his dependence on filmmaking:
"You know in a mental institution they sometimes give a person some clay or some basket weaving? It's the therapy of moviemaking that has been good in my life. If you don't work, it's unhealthy—for me, particularly unhealthy. I could sit here suffering from morbid introspection, ruing my mortality, being anxious. But it's very therapeutic to get up and think, Can I get this actor; does my third act work? All these solvable problems that are delightful puzzles, as opposed to the great puzzles of life that are unsolvable, or that have very bad solutions. So I get pleasure from doing this. It's my version of basket weaving" (McGrath).
Jasmine’s
own “basket weaving”—her garish life previous—ends up falling apart. So what
could fall apart for Woody Allen? Actress Cate Blanchett had this interesting
insight after working with Allen on Blue Jasmine: "Once you realize that
Woody is never pleased, he is never satisfied, that's why he makes a film a
year, that's why he's so prolific as a filmmaker. You realize he is actually in
some exquisite agony and it's horrific for him often to hear what he's written”
(Olsen). With this perspective, Allen has used Blue Jasmine to explore what would happen to him if he lost his craft: his release into absolute neuroticism.
Blue
Jasmine then ends, not on a positive note—such as when Midnight in Paris’s Gil happily resumes live in modern Paris—but
with a rather sadist turn. Jasmine leaves us gibbering to herself on a park
bench. But here is where the value of the film lies. The film has been said to
be have a “relevant punch.” It has been described as Allen’s “cruelest-ever
film” and “a bleak but moving gem.” And yes, the film is these things. Blue Jasmine is ultimately haunting,
because its ending is so feasible—feasible because it could happen to Allen
himself.
Works Cited
McGrath, Charles.
“How Woody Allen Sees It.” The Wall
Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, 28 Jun. 2013. Web. 9 Sept. 2013.
Olsen, Mark.
“’Blue Jasmine’: Woody Allen on regrets – He’s had a few.” Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 11 Jul. 2013. Web. 9 Sept.
2013.
Satran, Joe. “’To
Rome With Love’, Woody Allen’s Latest, Could Boost Italian Tourism.” Huff Post Travel. The Huffington Post, 6
Jun. 2012. Web. 9 Sept. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment